Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- planning:thermal_protection:windows:windowinstallationcalculation [2024/12/11 14:02] – yhsiao
+++ planning:thermal_protection:windows:windowinstallationcalculation [2024/12/11 14:03] (current) – yhsiao
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 The simplified model depicts the frame as a panel which varies in terms of its materials and Uf value. Three different methods for various frame types are outlined in Figure 1. In this figure, aluminium shells with excellent thermal conductivity are shown as a separate layer. When calculating the equivalent thermal conductivity, the aluminium layers can be left out.
+[{{ :picopen:window_installation_1.png?700 |Figure 1: The simplified thermal bridge calculation model differs depending on the frame type.}}]
 ===== Calculations =====
@@ Line 17: / Line 19: @@
 The following charts present the differences between the results obtained using the precise calculation method and the simplified calculation model. A positive value indicates that the result calculated using the simplified model is higher than that recorded using the precise calculation method, and that using the former to determine the energy balance generally has a low level of measurement uncertainty.
-[{{ :picopen:window_installation_1.png?700 |Figure 1: The simplified thermal bridge calculation model differs depending on the frame type.}}]
 {{  :picopen:window_installation_2.png?700  }}