Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- planning:non-residential_passive_house_buildings [2025/02/12 19:59] – [Passive House fire stations] jgrovesmith
+++ planning:non-residential_passive_house_buildings [2025/05/13 15:46] (current) – jgrovesmith
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Passive House school buildings are particularly interesting. Several school buildings have been realised using this standard and experiences gained from their use are now available: The Passive House Standards allows for energy savings of around 75% in comparison with average new school buildings - and of course there is no need for an additional heating or cooling system. The additional investment costs are within reasonable limits.\\
-\\
-[[.:non-residential_passive_house_buildings:passive_house_schools:passive_house_schools_requirements|]]
-[[.:non-residential_passive_house_buildings:passive_house_schools:how_go_about_it|]]
+Learn more: [[planning:non-residential_passive_house_buildings:passive_house_schools]]\\
-[[.:non-residential_passive_house_buildings:passive_house_schools:air_quality_in_schools|]] {{:picopen:members_only.png?25}}
 |[{{:picopen:riedberg-schule_frankfurt_passivhaus.jpg?300|**Best Practice Example - Riedberg Passive House School** \\
 The Passive House primary school and day nursery in Riedberg Frankfurt a.M. was opened in November 2004 after a construction period of only 14 months. The extra costs for achieving the Passive House Standard were a moderate 5.3 % in comparison with the currently valid EnEV (German energy saving regulations) standard. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:riedberg_passive_house_school_frankfurt_germany|Read more]]}}]|[{{:picopen:secondary_school_in_baesweiler_-_fig_2.jpg?350|**Secondary school in Baesweiler - modernised and energy-optimised to the Passive House Standard – a unique exemplary model!** \\
-Besides great environmental benefits like saving 90 % in heating costs and saving 530 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> per year, the decision-makers of the City of Baesweiler made it their objective to contribute to the elimination of a misconception which also many architects subscribe to, that “Passive Houses are thickly insulated, disproportionate, impersonal blocks that are impossible to realise in a good quality architectural style”. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:riedberg_passive_house_school_frankfurt_germany|Read more]]}}]|
+Besides great environmental benefits like saving 90 % in heating costs and saving 530 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> per year, the decision-makers of the City of Baesweiler made it their objective to contribute to the elimination of a misconception which also many architects subscribe to, that “Passive Houses are thickly insulated, disproportionate, impersonal blocks that are impossible to realise in a good quality architectural style”. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:secondary_school_in_baesweiler_germany|Read more]]}}]|
 ----