User Tools

Site Tools


planning:non-residential_passive_house_buildings

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
planning:non-residential_passive_house_buildings [2023/11/15 10:43] yaling.hsiao@passiv.deplanning:non-residential_passive_house_buildings [2023/11/15 11:02] yaling.hsiao@passiv.de
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 [{{:picopen:riedberg-schule_frankfurt_passivhaus.jpg?500|**Best Practice Example - Riedberg Passive House School** \\ [{{:picopen:riedberg-schule_frankfurt_passivhaus.jpg?500|**Best Practice Example - Riedberg Passive House School** \\
-The Passive House primary school and day nursery in Riedberg Frankfurt a.M. was opened in November 2004 after a construction period of only 14 months. The extra costs for achieving the Passive House Standard were a moderate 5.3 % in comparison with the currently valid EnEV (German energy saving regulations) standard. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:riedberg_passive_house_school_frankfurt_germany|Read more]]}}] [{{ :picopen:secondary_school_in_baesweiler_-_fig_2.jpg?500|**Secondary school in Baesweiler - modernised and energy-optimised to the Passive House Standard – a unique exemplary model!** \\ +The Passive House primary school and day nursery in Riedberg Frankfurt a.M. was opened in November 2004 after a construction period of only 14 months. The extra costs for achieving the Passive House Standard were a moderate 5.3 % in comparison with the currently valid EnEV (German energy saving regulations) standard. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:riedberg_passive_house_school_frankfurt_germany|Read more]]}}][{{:picopen:secondary_school_in_baesweiler_-_fig_2.jpg?500|**Secondary school in Baesweiler - modernised and energy-optimised to the Passive House Standard – a unique exemplary model!** \\ 
-Besides great environmental benefits like saving 90 % in heating costs and saving 530 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> per year, the decision-makers of the City of Baesweiler made it their objective to contribute to the elimination of a misconception which also many architects subscribe to, that “Passive Houses are thickly insulated, disproportionate, impersonal blocks that are impossible to realise in a good quality architectural style”. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:riedberg_passive_house_school_frankfurt_germany|Read more]] }}]+Besides great environmental benefits like saving 90 % in heating costs and saving 530 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> per year, the decision-makers of the City of Baesweiler made it their objective to contribute to the elimination of a misconception which also many architects subscribe to, that “Passive Houses are thickly insulated, disproportionate, impersonal blocks that are impossible to realise in a good quality architectural style”. [[:examples:non-residential_buildings:passive_house_schools:central_europe:riedberg_passive_house_school_frankfurt_germany|Read more]]}}]
  
 ---- ----
planning/non-residential_passive_house_buildings.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/19 10:52 by jgrovesmith