User Tools

Site Tools


planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:energy_balances_-_background

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:energy_balances_-_background [2014/09/18 18:19] – external edit 127.0.0.1planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:energy_balances_-_background [2018/06/22 12:45] – [See also] cblagojevic
Line 64: Line 64:
 There are  no "correct" reference values, only more or less "suitable" values.    There are  no "correct" reference values, only more or less "suitable" values.   
   * Borsch-Laaks and others have suggested that **the number of occupants** who live in a house should be referred to (kWh/Person/a).  But what happens when the children grow up and move out?  This is not suitable as a measure for the quality of the building. And it is wise to apply a measure for the quality of the building.\\ \\   * Borsch-Laaks and others have suggested that **the number of occupants** who live in a house should be referred to (kWh/Person/a).  But what happens when the children grow up and move out?  This is not suitable as a measure for the quality of the building. And it is wise to apply a measure for the quality of the building.\\ \\
-  * Others (e.g. the German Engineers Association) prefer to use the **gross volume V** as a reference value (kWh/m³).  Critics claim that with increasing insulation thicknesses, the heating demand would be reduced due to the increased  reference volume alone.  That is nonsense of course - but  other dead volumes can also increase the specific energy value.  This leads to faulty optimisation:  greater volumes are then built than are necessary and therefore they also have better specific values.  That is inappropriate.  .\\ \\+  * Others (e.g. the German Engineers Association) prefer to use the **gross volume V** as a reference value (kWh/m³).  Critics claim that with increasing insulation thicknesses, the heating demand would be reduced due to the increased  reference volume alone.  That is nonsense of course - but  other dead volumes can also increase the specific energy value.  This leads to faulty optimisation:  greater volumes are then built than are necessary and therefore they also have better specific values.  That is inappropriate.\\ \\
   * According to the Energy Saving Ordinance in Germany (EnEV), the** "useable" area A<sub>N</sub>** is simply a gross volume which is linearly converted  to just one area:\\ \\ **A<sub>N</sub> = 0,32 m<sup>-1</sup> V**\\ \\ This "area"  cannot be measured as a real area – it is a purely mathematical value – and it too increases with the level of insulation and with all types of dead volumes, so it is just as inappropriate.\\ \\   * According to the Energy Saving Ordinance in Germany (EnEV), the** "useable" area A<sub>N</sub>** is simply a gross volume which is linearly converted  to just one area:\\ \\ **A<sub>N</sub> = 0,32 m<sup>-1</sup> V**\\ \\ This "area"  cannot be measured as a real area – it is a purely mathematical value – and it too increases with the level of insulation and with all types of dead volumes, so it is just as inappropriate.\\ \\
   * **The gross floor area A<sub>BGF</sub>** is the area of the unfinished  building including all the floors.  It is very easy to determine – but also includes all non-useable areas like the inside and outside wall cross sections, access areas etc..  A<sub>BGF</sub> is the largest of the areas being discussed here.  It is often used in Switzerland (e.g. by MINERGIE®). That is why Swiss values always look good!\\ \\   * **The gross floor area A<sub>BGF</sub>** is the area of the unfinished  building including all the floors.  It is very easy to determine – but also includes all non-useable areas like the inside and outside wall cross sections, access areas etc..  A<sub>BGF</sub> is the largest of the areas being discussed here.  It is often used in Switzerland (e.g. by MINERGIE®). That is why Swiss values always look good!\\ \\
Line 146: Line 146:
 **Further reading articles** \\ **Further reading articles** \\
  
-[[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:energy_balances_-_background:calculating_the_treated_floor_area|]] \\+[[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:energy_balances_-_background:calculating_the_treated_floor_area|]]  {{:picopen:members_only.png?25|}} \\
  
 [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:calculations in hot and humid climates|PHPP calculations in hot and humid climates]] \\ [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:calculations in hot and humid climates|PHPP calculations in hot and humid climates]] \\
Line 155: Line 155:
 [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:Climate data tool|PHPP climate data tool]] \\ [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:Climate data tool|PHPP climate data tool]] \\
  
-[[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:climate_data_tool_for_the_southern_hemisphere|PHPP calculations for the Southern Hemisphere]]  \\+[[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:climate_data_tool_for_the_southern_hemisphere|PHPP calculations for the Southern Hemisphere]]  {{:picopen:members_only.png?25|}}  \\
  
 [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:designPH plugin|"designPH" plugin for Trimble Sketchup]] \\ [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:designPH plugin|"designPH" plugin for Trimble Sketchup]] \\
planning/calculating_energy_efficiency/energy_balances_-_background.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/03 14:57 by wfeist