Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- affiliate_literature:policy [2025/04/29 11:53] – yaling.hsiao@passiv.de
+++ affiliate_literature:policy [2025/04/29 11:55] (current) – yaling.hsiao@passiv.de
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ^   ^^Publication^Year^Organisation|
-|[[https://passivhaus.uk/passivhaus-compared-to-the-proposed-fhs/|{{:picopen:2025_phtrust.png?nolink&150}}]]||**[[https://passivhaus.uk/passivhaus-compared-to-the-proposed-fhs/|Passivhaus compared to the proposed FHS 2025]]**  \\ This position paper evaluates the Future Homes Standard (FHS) 2025 against Passivhaus Classic, comparing energy performance, heating costs, and carbon emissions. The analysis models two FHS options – one with photovoltaics (FHS PV) and one without (FHS no PV) – against Passivhaus. Findings show that both FHS options result in higher annual energy costs than 2021 regulations, with FHS no PV nearly doubling costs in some cases. In contrast, Passivhaus Classic matches or outperforms FHS PV using only improved building fabric, delivering long-term energy savings without reliance on PV, which is not always feasible and may degrade over time.|2025|**[[https://www.passivhaustrust.org.uk/|Passivhaus Trust (PHT), UK]]** |
+|[[https://passivhaus.uk/passivhaus-compared-to-the-proposed-fhs/|{{:picopen:2025_phtrust.png?nolink&150}}]]||**[[https://passivhaus.uk/passivhaus-compared-to-the-proposed-fhs/|Passivhaus compared to the proposed FHS 2025]]**  \\ This position paper evaluates the Future Homes Standard (FHS) 2025 against Passivhaus Classic, comparing energy performance, heating costs, and carbon emissions. The analysis models two FHS options – one with photovoltaics (FHS PV) and one without (FHS no PV) – against Passivhaus.|2025|**[[https://www.passivhaustrust.org.uk/|Passivhaus Trust (PHT), UK]]** |
 |[[https://passivehousenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-Policies-We-Want-Brief.pdf|{{:picopen:screenshot-2023-09-28-095813.png?nolink&150}}]]||**[[https://passivehousenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023-Policies-We-Want-Brief.pdf|Stepping Up to Passive: Policies We Want]]**  \\ A brief guide that clarifies best practices in implementing Passive House building codes, ensuring that market confidence, professional competence, and a robust product supply chain are all in place ahead of the eventual transformation of baseline codes. These four steps will ensure a smooth transition to the policies we want.|2023|**[[http://passivehousenetwork.org/|Passive House Network (PHN)]]** |
 |[[https://passivehousenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PHN_Report_Policy_That_Works_V1.1_June_2022.pdf|{{:picopen:policy-that-works-june-2022-phn-report.jpg?nolink&150|policy-that-works-june-2022-phn-report.jpg}}]]||**[[https://passivehousenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PHN_Report_Policy_That_Works_V1.1_June_2022.pdf|Policy That Works: An investigation into policies driving Passive House adoption in North America]]** \\ A comprehensive study to identify what, where and how Passive House policies were being implemented across North America. Not only did we want to understand the drivers behind these policies, but we wanted to determine which policies were more successful and why.|2022|**[[http://passivehousenetwork.org/|Passive House Network (PHN)]]** |