Thermal insulation – done properly

Many energy applications have the purpose of maintaining a desired temperature – while the surrounding temperature differs and possibly also changes. If the desired temperature is higher, we speak of heating, and if it is lower, we speak of cooling.

Solely due to the laws of physics, there is a tendency in such circumstances for an energy flow to pass from an area with the higher temperature to the area with the lower temperature – this is known as “heat” or “heat flow”.

Measures which reduce this heat flow serve the purpose of thermal protection; the component mainly used for this is thermal insulation. Thermal insulation always has a loss-reducing effect - it does not matter whether the task is heating or cooling. There are still some misconceptions relating to the topic of thermal protection: the alleged problem will not arise at all if the appropriate approach is applied. We have discussed these here: Facts relating to thermal protection. By the way, heating (or cooling) energy is only necessary to the extent to which such losses occur in the first place. Because we can drastically reduce such losses, the required heating or cooling energy can in principle be kept as low as desirable1).

Today, space heating is by the far the most predominant energy application. Many of the measures discussed here have to do with space heating and also the examples given here are often chosen from this area. However, this does not mean that heat flows do not play a significant role for hot water or food refrigeration or industrial processes; they too can be reduced through better thermal protection.

Important basic principles for this are as follows:

In practical application, this means:

Fig.1: Example of “so-called” thermal insulation, shown here in a ceiling. These shreds of insulation are almost useless because air is flowing around them from all sides

Example: an insulation panel simply leaning against the wall will have almost no effect because the indoor air can simply flow around this panel just like it does with other things in the room; unfortunately, that's what many of the so-called “insulation measures” carried out in the past look like on closer examination: “beautifully cladded”, with the insulation material lying loosely in the space in between3). The building physics expert Professor Pohl commented this as follows: “You might as well leave the insulation material out in the garden!”

Further information on the topic of thermal protection as an overall concept.

To read about the measures for existing buildings within the framework of the “EfficiencyNOW” campaign:

Subsequent thermal protection for existing building stock

1)
If there are no “free contributions”; however, not to exactly zero - as would be said in mathematics: smaller than any given number greater than zero. The “impossibleness of the perpetuum mobile” also has the same underlying statement: the “infinitely/endlessly” running machine would be equal to zero, and this actually doesn't exist; but a system may potentially run for billions of years, the Earth's orbit around the sun is one example.
2)
In building physics, this is usually called the “airtight layer” although the degree of leakage that is still permissible in construction is quite high compared to submarines or spaceships; it's simply that “blowing through” an insulation layer should not be possible
3)
Which by the way is one of the reasons for the view expressed sometimes that insulation would not have worked.