planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:phpp_-_validated_and_proven_in_practice
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:phpp_-_validated_and_proven_in_practice [2020/08/05 16:30] – [Literature] wfeist | planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package:phpp_-_validated_and_proven_in_practice [2023/06/14 16:33] (current) – jgrovesmith | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
It is surprising that the results of the average measured values agree so well with the PHPP calculation. This is probably coincidental, | It is surprising that the results of the average measured values agree so well with the PHPP calculation. This is probably coincidental, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Mitchell and Natarajan investigated a large sample of built passive houses build in the UK [Mitchell 2020]. They also compared these monitoring results with PHPP calculation, | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
We often get the question, why there is such a huge [[operation: | We often get the question, why there is such a huge [[operation: | ||
Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | ===== PHPP for exisiting buildings ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | PHPP was originally developped and validated for the design of energy efficient buildings with low energy demand. The question arises whether the same method and tool is also applicable and reliable for less efficient buildings, or even existing buildings with very high energy demand. This question was adressed as part of the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
===== Cooling Energy Algorithms ===== | ===== Cooling Energy Algorithms ===== | ||
planning/calculating_energy_efficiency/phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package/phpp_-_validated_and_proven_in_practice.1596637858.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/05 16:30 by wfeist