certification:passive_house_categories:per
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
certification:passive_house_categories:per [2015/03/11 14:32] – bwuensch | certification:passive_house_categories:per [2015/04/01 12:06] – wolfgang.hasper@passiv.de | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== The PER sustainability assessment ====== | ====== The PER sustainability assessment ====== | ||
- | Which parameter can be used as a suitable indicator for the sustainability of buildings from an energy standpoint? The so-called PER factors (Primary Energy Renewable) were first introduced in the final presentation at last year’s International Passive House Conference, as future-oriented sustainability assessment criteria [Feist 2014]. With the new release of the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP version 9), | + | Which parameter can be used as a suitable indicator for the sustainability of buildings from an energy standpoint? The so-called PER factors (Primary Energy Renewable) were first introduced in the final presentation at last year’s International Passive House Conference, as future-oriented sustainability assessment criteria [Feist 2014]. With the new release of the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP version 9), |
==== PER factors: The methodology ==== | ==== PER factors: The methodology ==== | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The methodology used to derive PER factors is based on the ideas that have previously been published in [Feist 2013] and [Feist 2014]. The same approach was further developed, applied and analysed internationally. With an hourly resolution load profiles of the energy demand are simulated in the context of a future scenario - where the energy is supplied solely by renewable energy (RE) sources, including all necessary storage facilities (Figure 1). The individual calculations are based on climate data from various sources, the resulting PER factors describe how much more renewable energy must be supplied in order to cover the final energy consumed at the building, including all losses incurred along the way. | The methodology used to derive PER factors is based on the ideas that have previously been published in [Feist 2013] and [Feist 2014]. The same approach was further developed, applied and analysed internationally. With an hourly resolution load profiles of the energy demand are simulated in the context of a future scenario - where the energy is supplied solely by renewable energy (RE) sources, including all necessary storage facilities (Figure 1). The individual calculations are based on climate data from various sources, the resulting PER factors describe how much more renewable energy must be supplied in order to cover the final energy consumed at the building, including all losses incurred along the way. | ||
- | {{:certification: | + | {{:picopen: |
The PER factor is determined by the simultaneity of available energy resources and the energy demand, as this dictates how much energy needs to be temporarily stored before it is used. Short-term storage can technically be achieved fairly efficiently, | The PER factor is determined by the simultaneity of available energy resources and the energy demand, as this dictates how much energy needs to be temporarily stored before it is used. Short-term storage can technically be achieved fairly efficiently, | ||
- | \\ | + | |
- | |{{:certification: | + | [{{:picopen: |
- | |// | + | |
- | Versorgung am Gebäude inklusive der Verluste für Kurzzeit- und Saisonal-Speicherung.**//|\\ | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
===== Load profiles – Supply and Consumption ===== | ===== Load profiles – Supply and Consumption ===== | ||
Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
The modelled future energy supply network is based purely on electricity from renewable sources. Three different sources are taken into account: Photovoltaics, | The modelled future energy supply network is based purely on electricity from renewable sources. Three different sources are taken into account: Photovoltaics, | ||
- | The hourly electricity production through solar power is calculated based on a photovoltaic system oriented toward the equator. The power output is calculated based on the solar radiation information from the respective climate data set, taking into account a tempe-rature-sensitive efficiency of the photovoltaic module. The model’s inclination is determined such that the highest possible annual energy yield is reached at the considered location. | + | The hourly electricity production through solar power is calculated based on a photovoltaic system oriented toward the equator. The power output is calculated based on the solar radiation information from the respective climate data set, taking into account a temperature-sensitive efficiency of the photovoltaic module. The model’s inclination is determined such that the highest possible annual energy yield is reached at the considered location. |
The hourly electricity produced through wind energy is calculated based on a smoothed profile of hourly wind velocities. The same climate data set is used, in order to take account of local climatic correlations between wind and radiation or temperature. However, such localised wind data is rarely representative of the potential of wind energy in the surrounding region. The original wind velocity data is therefore calibrated based on long-term measured averages of the region [SSE] and extrapolated to a hub height of 150 m. The actual power output then depends on the turbine’s power curve, which is modelled with a specific power output of 380 W/m² and 200 W/m² for regions with strong and weak wind, respectively (based on [Mono et.al. 2014]). If the average wind speed at hub height is lower than 4 m/s, a significant development of wind energy in the area is unlikely for economic reasons. The contribution of wind energy to the total mix in the calculations is therefore limited to 0.5 % of the annual yield. Offshore wind energy is not considered at this stage – the calculations are slightly on the safe side in this regard. | The hourly electricity produced through wind energy is calculated based on a smoothed profile of hourly wind velocities. The same climate data set is used, in order to take account of local climatic correlations between wind and radiation or temperature. However, such localised wind data is rarely representative of the potential of wind energy in the surrounding region. The original wind velocity data is therefore calibrated based on long-term measured averages of the region [SSE] and extrapolated to a hub height of 150 m. The actual power output then depends on the turbine’s power curve, which is modelled with a specific power output of 380 W/m² and 200 W/m² for regions with strong and weak wind, respectively (based on [Mono et.al. 2014]). If the average wind speed at hub height is lower than 4 m/s, a significant development of wind energy in the area is unlikely for economic reasons. The contribution of wind energy to the total mix in the calculations is therefore limited to 0.5 % of the annual yield. Offshore wind energy is not considered at this stage – the calculations are slightly on the safe side in this regard. | ||
- | Last but not least, the electricity produced from hydropower is taken into account based on the predicted contribution of this energy source to each country’s future total energy demand. The prediction for future hydropower generation | + | Last but not least, the electricity produced from hydropower is taken into account based on the predicted contribution of this energy source to each country’s future total energy demand. The prediction for future hydropower generation |
==== Electricity demand at the building ==== | ==== Electricity demand at the building ==== | ||
At the receiving end we differentiate between five different load profiles for different types of energy consumption: | At the receiving end we differentiate between five different load profiles for different types of energy consumption: | ||
- | |||
- | \\ | ||
- | |{{: | ||
- | |// | ||
- | Versorgung am Gebäude inklusive der Verluste für Kurzzeit- und Saisonal-Speicherung.**// | ||
- | \\ | ||
The load profile of the household electricity (20 kWh/ | The load profile of the household electricity (20 kWh/ | ||
Line 42: | Line 34: | ||
All load profiles are smoothed ±4 hours in order to account for variations caused e.g. by different user behaviour. | All load profiles are smoothed ±4 hours in order to account for variations caused e.g. by different user behaviour. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{: | ||
===== Site-specific PER factors ===== | ===== Site-specific PER factors ===== | ||
Line 51: | Line 45: | ||
It is further assumed that the seasonal storage has the required capacity to store exactly the amount of energy storage required over the course of the year (supply = demand + losses). One possibility of a working seasonal storage system is the conversion of RE electricity into methane, for which a conversion efficiency of 57 % is assumed. The re-conversion from gas into electricity in a CCTG plant is modelled with an efficiency of 50 %. Electricity consumed via the seasonal storage, therefore has an overall efficiency of only approx. 30 %. Finally, 5 % distribution losses are added for all electricity transmission via the electrical grid. | It is further assumed that the seasonal storage has the required capacity to store exactly the amount of energy storage required over the course of the year (supply = demand + losses). One possibility of a working seasonal storage system is the conversion of RE electricity into methane, for which a conversion efficiency of 57 % is assumed. The re-conversion from gas into electricity in a CCTG plant is modelled with an efficiency of 50 %. Electricity consumed via the seasonal storage, therefore has an overall efficiency of only approx. 30 %. Finally, 5 % distribution losses are added for all electricity transmission via the electrical grid. | ||
- | \\ | + | [{{:picopen: |
- | |{{:certification: | + | |
- | |// | + | ---- |
- | Versorgung am Gebäude inklusive der Verluste für Kurzzeit- und Saisonal-Speicherung.**// | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
The hourly RE profile depends on the proportion of solar and wind energy in the mix, in addition to the fixed percentage of hydropower. Both extremes (no solar or no wind), as well as four intermediate steps are modelled, which results in six calculations for the demand profile. The PER factor is determined based on the most favourable combination of wind and solar energy. | The hourly RE profile depends on the proportion of solar and wind energy in the mix, in addition to the fixed percentage of hydropower. Both extremes (no solar or no wind), as well as four intermediate steps are modelled, which results in six calculations for the demand profile. The PER factor is determined based on the most favourable combination of wind and solar energy. | ||
Line 63: | Line 55: | ||
For each of the load profiles the PER routine calculates the required RE supply to cover the total energy demand, plus all storage losses. The PER factor for the energy application in question then equates to the slope of the changing RE supply over the increase in energy demand (examples are shown in Figure 4). In some cases this can lead to factors below one, which would mean that less energy needs to be additionally generated than will be consumed. This is the case only if the additional energy demand balances out seasonal disparities and thus reduces the need for seasonal storage, e.g. additional cooling in a heating dominated climate. | For each of the load profiles the PER routine calculates the required RE supply to cover the total energy demand, plus all storage losses. The PER factor for the energy application in question then equates to the slope of the changing RE supply over the increase in energy demand (examples are shown in Figure 4). In some cases this can lead to factors below one, which would mean that less energy needs to be additionally generated than will be consumed. This is the case only if the additional energy demand balances out seasonal disparities and thus reduces the need for seasonal storage, e.g. additional cooling in a heating dominated climate. | ||
- | \\ | + | [{{:picopen: |
- | |{{:certification: | + | |
- | |// | + | |
- | Versorgung am Gebäude inklusive der Verluste für Kurzzeit- und Saisonal-Speicherung.**// | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
- | \\ | + | [{{:picopen: |
- | |{{:certification: | + | |
- | |// | + | ---- |
- | Versorgung am Gebäude inklusive der Verluste für Kurzzeit- und Saisonal-Speicherung.**// | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
Figure 5 shows example PER factors for selected climates under very different climatic conditions (all with comparatively small hydropower contribution). The results for household electricity and domestic hot water don’t vary much, with typical values around 1.3 – i.e. 30 % more RE electricity needs to be supplied than can actually be used at the building. The factors for heating, cooling and dehumidification are more strongly influenced by the given local climatic conditions. Unfortunately, | Figure 5 shows example PER factors for selected climates under very different climatic conditions (all with comparatively small hydropower contribution). The results for household electricity and domestic hot water don’t vary much, with typical values around 1.3 – i.e. 30 % more RE electricity needs to be supplied than can actually be used at the building. The factors for heating, cooling and dehumidification are more strongly influenced by the given local climatic conditions. Unfortunately, | ||
Line 82: | Line 68: | ||
The PER factors to be used in the PHPP are thus not based on individual local calculations but rather on a combination via a global Fourier approximation of the results calculated for over 700 locations worldwide. In addition, the minimum value used in the PHPP is 1 (supply = demand). Figure 6 shows the average value and variation of the PER factor for space heating of all locations currently integrated into the PHPP. | The PER factors to be used in the PHPP are thus not based on individual local calculations but rather on a combination via a global Fourier approximation of the results calculated for over 700 locations worldwide. In addition, the minimum value used in the PHPP is 1 (supply = demand). Figure 6 shows the average value and variation of the PER factor for space heating of all locations currently integrated into the PHPP. | ||
- | \\ | + | |
- | |{{:certification: | + | [{{:picopen: |
- | |// | + | |
- | Versorgung am Gebäude inklusive der Verluste für Kurzzeit- und Saisonal-Speicherung.**// | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
===== Summary and Outlook ===== | ===== Summary and Outlook ===== | ||
Line 96: | Line 79: | ||
The results clearly illustrate that a high level of efficiency of heating is more important than for cooling when looking at using resources responsibly and sustainably - the reason being the simultaneity of RE availability and energy demand over the course of the year. | The results clearly illustrate that a high level of efficiency of heating is more important than for cooling when looking at using resources responsibly and sustainably - the reason being the simultaneity of RE availability and energy demand over the course of the year. | ||
- | ===== Literature | + | |
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Literature ==== | ||
[Feist 2013] Feist, | [Feist 2013] Feist, | ||
- | [Feist 2014] Feist, | + | [Feist 2014] Feist, |
[intpow 2009] World Hydro Potential and Development. intpow, Norwegian Renewable Energy Parnters 2009 | [intpow 2009] World Hydro Potential and Development. intpow, Norwegian Renewable Energy Parnters 2009 |
certification/passive_house_categories/per.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/18 19:11 by jgrovesmith