User Tools

Site Tools


basics:energy_and_ecology:renewable_sources_of_energy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
basics:energy_and_ecology:renewable_sources_of_energy [2014/09/18 18:19] – external edit 127.0.0.1basics:energy_and_ecology:renewable_sources_of_energy [2019/02/21 10:05] (current) cblagojevic
Line 4: Line 4:
 \\ \\
 The Passive House is a perfect example for this:  The Passive House is a perfect example for this: 
-  * more than a third of the total energy consumption of a Passive House can be covered by **hot water collectors** – because a Passive House requires more energy for the generation of hot water than it does for the heating. Thermal collectors are the best solution for the provision of hot water. +  * more than a third of the total energy consumption of a Passive House in a typical cool moderate climate can be covered by **hot water collectors** – because a Passive House requires more energy for the generation of hot water than it does for the heating. Thermal collectors are the best solution for the provision of hot water. (The figures are even better in warm moderate climates and in "lucky climates like California: it could be 50% to full cover.) 
-  * The remaining demand is so small that it can be met in a fully cost-effective way, e.g. by buying a **share in a wind power plant** – this has already been implemented in practice (example in illustration). + 
-  * **Photovoltaic systems** can also contribute significantly to the supply of energy in Passive Houses. If we are honest, it will be realised that the contribution of photovoltaic systems to "ordinary" houses with high consumption values is no more than a "fig leaf"; but Passive House efficiency is different.\\+  * The remaining demand is so small in Passive Hosues that it can be met in a fully cost-effective way by renewable energy, e.g. by buying a **share in a wind power plant** – this has already been implemented in practice (example in illustration). 
 + 
 +  * **Photovoltaic systems** can also contribute significantly to the supply of energy //in Passive Houses//But let us be honest: The contribution of photovoltaic systems to "ordinary" inefficient houses with high consumption values is no more than a "fig leaf"; but Passive House efficiency makes the difference.\\
 \\ \\
 |{{ :picopen:passivhaus_siedlung_kronsberg.jpg?350 }}|{{ :picopen:wind_kronsberg.jpg?200 }}| |{{ :picopen:passivhaus_siedlung_kronsberg.jpg?350 }}|{{ :picopen:wind_kronsberg.jpg?200 }}|
Line 12: Line 14:
 \\ \\
 \\ \\
-Due to the very high energy efficiency of the Passive House, there are increased opportunities for an adequate supply of energy though renewable sources. For one thing, the technical prerequisites are excellent: with low consumption **even minimal power supplies** are sufficient; and smaller power densities are a characteristic of renewable energy sources; for another thing, the cost-efficient implementation takes place in a better way: if the energy consumption is very low, the price for a kilowatt hour of conventional energy supply is usually very high. In the Passive House, however, this doesn't matter because the **consumption is so small that even high prices become bearable**. That is the economic opportunity for renewable energy: the price per kilowatt hour is still high, but in a Passive House the user can afford it without any problem. Therefore the use of renewable energy with high energy efficiency is economically more attractive in relation to the conventional supply of energy.\\+Due to the very high energy efficiency of the Passive House, there are increased opportunities for an adequate supply of energy though renewable sources. For one thing, the technical prerequisites are excellent: with low consumption **even minimal power supplies** are sufficient; and smaller power densities are a characteristic of renewable energy sources; for another thing, the cost-efficient implementation takes place in a better way: if the energy consumption is very low, the price for a kilowatt hour of conventional energy supply will usually be relatively high. In the Passive House, however, this doesn't matter because the **consumption is so small that even high prices become bearable**. That is the economic opportunity for renewable energy: the price per kilowatt hour is still high, but in a Passive House the user can afford it without any problem. Therefore the use of renewable energy with high energy efficiency is economically more attractive in relation to the conventional supply of energy.\\
 \\ \\
 |{{ :picopen:endenergie_erneuerbare_farbig.png?350 }}|{{ :picopen:endenergie_erneuerbare_und_effizienz_farbig.png?350 }}| |{{ :picopen:endenergie_erneuerbare_farbig.png?350 }}|{{ :picopen:endenergie_erneuerbare_und_effizienz_farbig.png?350 }}|
-|**//With constantly high energy consumptions, at the moment\\ it is difficult to identify the contribution of renewable ener-\\ gy sources (colour) amongst the exhaustible sources (grey).\\ However, a very positive estimate (column on the right)\\ definitely shows significant levels of supplied energy.\\ \\ => With poor efficiency, a relevant proportion will still be\\ dominated by the fossil fuel sources in the future. \\ \\ \\ //**|**//In contrast, if the potentials for more efficient use are imple-\\ mented, the same high absolute energy generation from\\ renewable energy sources will make up a considerable part\\ of the total supply; this can be as much as 50% for electri-\\ city, and for fuels it can be a quarter of the demand.\\ \\ => As a result, the use of fossil energy sources as a combi-\\ nation of "renewable + efficient" energy sources can be\\ reduced to less than a third in comparison with the current\\ value; this could be possible in around fifty years' time.//**|\\+|**//With constantly high energy consumptions, at the moment it is difficult to identify the contribution of renewable energy sources (colour) amongst the exhaustible sources (grey). However, a very positive estimate (column on the right) definitely shows significant levels of supplied energy.\\ \\ => With poor efficiency, a relevant proportion will still be dominated by the fossil fuel sources in the future. \\ \\ \\ //**|**//In contrast, if the potentials for more efficient use are implemented, the same high absolute energy generation from renewable energy sources will make up a considerable part of the total supply; this can be as much as 50% for electricity, and for fuels it can be a quarter of the demand.\\ \\ => As a result, the use of fossil energy sources as a combination of "renewable + efficient" energy sources can be reduced to less than a third in comparison with the current value; this could be possible in around fifty years' time.//**|\\
 \\ \\
 \\ \\
Line 21: Line 23:
  
     * less burden on social funds (through noticeably increased employment)     * less burden on social funds (through noticeably increased employment)
 +
     * additional tax revenue (due to added value)     * additional tax revenue (due to added value)
 +
     * increase in buying power (due to less energy costs)     * increase in buying power (due to less energy costs)
 +
     * the reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emission.\\     * the reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emission.\\
 \\ \\
basics/energy_and_ecology/renewable_sources_of_energy.txt · Last modified: 2019/02/21 10:05 by cblagojevic