Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- basics:building_physics_-_basics:thermal_bridges:tbcalculation:ground_contact:ground_contact [2016/08/16 13:17] – [Thermal capacity of the ground] mschueren
+++ basics:building_physics_-_basics:thermal_bridges:tbcalculation:ground_contact:ground_contact [2022/01/18 15:29] (current) – [Thermal capacity of the ground] yaling.hsiao@passiv.de
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
-/
 ==== Thermal capacity of the ground====
-In building physics, the thermal capacity of a material is given by the specific thermal capacity c. This defines the amount of energy that is required in order to increase one kilogramme of a material by one Kelvin. This means that materials can absorb a certain amount of heat and release this again depending on the changes in the applied temperature over time. The building envelope exhibits thermal inertia depending on its mass. An exterior wall which absorbs heat throughout the day releases it again during cooler temperatures. The greater the< mass of the exterior wall is, the longer the charging and discharging process will be. For most building components this time interval is relatively small. If longer time intervals are considered, such as those for the monthly method, this effect is averaged out because the number of charging phases are the same as the discharging phases. Steady-state consideration of the heat flows is therefore quite adequate. This is no longer the case for building components in contact with the ground. The following illustration shows the temperature gradient in the ground as a function of the external temperature:
+In building physics, the thermal capacity of a material is given by the specific thermal capacity c. This defines the amount of energy that is required in order to increase one kilogramme of a material by one Kelvin. This means that materials can absorb a certain amount of heat and release this again depending on the changes in the applied temperature over time. The building envelope exhibits thermal inertia depending on its mass. An exterior wall which absorbs heat throughout the day releases it again during cooler temperatures. The greater the mass of the exterior wall is, the longer the charging and discharging process will be. For most building components this time interval is relatively small. If longer time intervals are considered, such as those for the monthly method, this effect is averaged out because the number of charging phases are the same as the discharging phases. Steady-state consideration of the heat flows is therefore quite adequate. This is no longer the case for building components in contact with the ground. The following illustration shows the temperature gradient in the ground as a function of the external temperature:
 {{ :picopen:erdreichtemp.jpg?nolink&600 |}}
-The amplitudes of the sinsoidal temperature gradients clearly decline with increasing soil depth. Simultaneously, a phase shift takes place so that external air temperature peaks reach the deeper regions much later on. The amplitude peaks of 21.5 °C (on 21.07) in the test reference years shown here only has an impact 91 days later at a depth of 5 m. Here the peak temperature was still 13.1 °C on 20.10. With increasing depth, an almost constant temperature at the level of the mean annual temperature is reached. The high phase shifts no longer allow a purely steady-state consideration of the transmission heat losses for the monthly method since the charging and discharging processes may extend over several months. Heat storage in the ground and the resultant damping action and phase shifting of the ground temperature under the floor slab is therefore of significance when calculating heat losses through the ground.
+The amplitudes of the sinusoidal temperature gradients clearly decline with increasing soil depth. Simultaneously, a phase shift takes place so that external air temperature peaks reach the deeper regions much later on. The amplitude peaks of 21.5 °C (on 21.07) in the test reference years shown here only has an impact 91 days later at a depth of 5 m. Here the peak temperature was still 13.1 °C on 20.10. With increasing depth, an almost constant temperature at the level of the mean annual temperature is reached. The high phase shifts no longer allow a purely steady-state consideration of the transmission heat losses for the monthly method since the charging and discharging processes may extend over several months. Heat storage in the ground and the resultant damping action and phase shifting of the ground temperature under the floor slab is therefore of significance when calculating heat losses through the ground.
 {{ :picopen:superpositionsprinzip_erdreich.jpg?nolink&600 |}}
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 **Further literature on the topic of skirt insulation:**
-**[AkkP 48]** Using Passive House technology for retrofitting non-residential buildings/ Heat losses towards the ground ; Protocol Volume No. 48 of the Research Group for Cost-effective Passive Houses, 1st Edition, Passive House Institute, Darmstadt 2012 ({{:picopen:faxb.pdf|Link zur Publikationsliste des PHI}})
+**[AkkP 48]** Using Passive House technology for retrofitting non-residential buildings/ Heat losses towards the ground ; Protocol Volume No. 48 of the Research Group for Cost-effective Passive Houses, 1st Edition, Passive House Institute, Darmstadt 2012 [[https://shop.passivehouse.com/en/products/48-einsatz-von-passivhaustechnologien-bei-der-modernisierung-von-nichtwohngebauden-66/|Link to PHI Publication]]
@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 ===== Transient or steady-state Ψ-values? =====
-For calculating thermal bridges in the area in contact with the ground, a steady-state approximation suffices in many cases and dynamic simulation can be dispensed with. Although dynamic simulations provide more accurate results, they also incur additional effort. Moreover, on account of the usually only imprecisely known thermal characteristics of the ground, the expected accuracy of a one-dimensional or two-dimensional transient numerical calculation is not so high that this extra effort can also be justified (except in the case of large or research projects). Frequently, the Ψ-values calculated in a steady-state manner are therefore also used as harmonic Ψ-values (see the Ground worksheet in the [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package |PHPP]]). However, for thermal bridges of areas in contact with the ground which are far away from the ground surface, this assumption is will usually be quite pessimistic. Whether it is worthwhile to perform a time-dependent calculation is easily determined by setting the harmonic Ψ-value in the [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package |PHPP]] to the same value as the steady-state Ψ-value one time, and equal to zero another time and then observing the influence on the final result. A steady-state calculation under the mentioned boundary conditions can also give pessimistic results with respect to the surface temperatures.
+For calculating thermal bridges in the area in contact with the ground, a steady-state approximation suffices in many cases and dynamic simulation can be dispensed with. Although dynamic simulations provide more accurate results, they also incur additional effort. Moreover, on account of the usually only imprecisely known thermal characteristics of the ground, the expected accuracy of a one-dimensional or two-dimensional transient numerical calculation is not so high that this extra effort can also be justified (except in the case of large or research projects). Frequently, the Ψ-values calculated in a steady-state manner are therefore also used as harmonic Ψ-values (see the Ground worksheet in the [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package |PHPP]]). However, for thermal bridges of areas in contact with the ground which are far away from the ground surface, this assumption will usually be quite pessimistic. Whether it is worthwhile to perform a time-dependent calculation is easily determined by setting the harmonic Ψ-value in the [[planning:calculating_energy_efficiency:phpp_-_the_passive_house_planning_package |PHPP]] to the same value as the steady-state Ψ-value one time, and equal to zero another time and then observing the influence on the final result. A steady-state calculation under the mentioned boundary conditions can also give pessimistic results with respect to the surface temperatures.
 ==== Further literature ====
-**[AkkP 27]** **Heat losses through the ground**; Protocol Volume No. 27 of the Research Group for Cost-effective Passive Houses, \\ 1st Edition, Passive House Institute, Darmstadt 2004 ({{:picopen:faxb.pdf|Link to list of PHI publications}})
+**[AkkP 27]** **Heat losses through the ground**; Protocol Volume No. 27 of the Research Group for Cost-effective Passive Houses, \\ 1st Edition, Passive House Institute, Darmstadt 2004  [[https://shop.passivehouse.com/en/products/27-warmeverluste-durch-das-erdreich-45/|Link to PHI publications]]
 ===== See also =====